FINTRAC Issues $264,000 Penalty: Lessons for the Compliance Community
On September 23, 2025, the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) announced an administrative monetary penalty of $264,000 against Spence Diamonds Ltd. following a compliance examination under the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act. While Spence Diamonds operates in the precious metals and stones sector, the lessons from this case extend well beyond jewelry retailers. They are highly relevant for money services businesses, where compliance obligations are equally rigorous and scrutiny from regulators is intensifying.
The violations cited by FINTRAC were wide ranging. Spence Diamonds failed to submit suspicious transaction reports in cases where there were reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorist financing. It did not have written compliance policies and procedures that were approved by senior management, nor did it properly assess and document risks as required. The company also lacked a written training program for staff and failed to perform periodic reviews of its compliance regime. Each of these failures points to gaps in fundamental compliance pillars that every regulated entity is expected to uphold.
Although the penalty was specific to a single firm, FINTRAC’s broader message is clear. Compliance cannot be treated as a static exercise or an administrative checkbox. Regulators expect programs that are living and adaptable, with clear documentation and senior leadership engagement. This is particularly important at a time when enforcement activity is rising. In the last fiscal year alone, FINTRAC issued 23 notices of violation worth over $25 million in penalties, the highest total since it gained the authority to impose fines.
The violations cited by FINTRAC were wide ranging. Spence Diamonds failed to submit suspicious transaction reports in cases where there were reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorist financing. It did not have written compliance policies and procedures that were approved by senior management, nor did it properly assess and document risks as required. The company also lacked a written training program for staff and failed to perform periodic reviews of its compliance regime. Each of these failures points to gaps in fundamental compliance pillars that every regulated entity is expected to uphold.
Although the penalty was specific to a single firm, FINTRAC’s broader message is clear. Compliance cannot be treated as a static exercise or an administrative checkbox. Regulators expect programs that are living and adaptable, with clear documentation and senior leadership engagement. This is particularly important at a time when enforcement activity is rising. In the last fiscal year alone, FINTRAC issued 23 notices of violation worth over $25 million in penalties, the highest total since it gained the authority to impose fines.
For MSBs, the implications are significant. Businesses in this sector face unique risks given the scale and speed of transactions, the variety of customer profiles, and the cross-border nature of many services. Weaknesses in reporting, training, or risk assessments do not simply create regulatory exposure, they increase vulnerability to misuse by criminal actors. A robust compliance framework is not only a legal requirement, it is also a business safeguard that protects reputation and builds trust with clients and partners.
There is also a cultural dimension to consider. Effective compliance programs are not built in isolation. They require buy-in from leadership, accountability at every level, and ongoing investment in staff training and monitoring systems. Periodic reviews should not be viewed as a burden but as an opportunity to identify blind spots and strengthen resilience.
Documentation, often seen as administrative overhead, becomes the record that demonstrates seriousness of purpose and readiness to defend compliance decisions during a FINTRAC examination.
There is also a cultural dimension to consider. Effective compliance programs are not built in isolation. They require buy-in from leadership, accountability at every level, and ongoing investment in staff training and monitoring systems. Periodic reviews should not be viewed as a burden but as an opportunity to identify blind spots and strengthen resilience.
Documentation, often seen as administrative overhead, becomes the record that demonstrates seriousness of purpose and readiness to defend compliance decisions during a FINTRAC examination.
Looking at this case from a strategic standpoint, the real lesson is that proactive compliance is far less costly than reactive enforcement. The financial penalty against Spence Diamonds has closed the matter, but the reputational impact will linger.
For MSBs, the choice is clear. A forward-looking approach that treats compliance as part of business strategy, rather than an obligation imposed from outside, is the surest way to avoid similar pitfalls.
If your business would benefit from expert guidance, our team is here to help. We work with MSBs to review compliance programs, strengthen reporting frameworks, and deliver training that meets FINTRAC expectations.
Reach out to us to discuss how we can support your compliance goals and reduce the risk of costly penalties.
For MSBs, the choice is clear. A forward-looking approach that treats compliance as part of business strategy, rather than an obligation imposed from outside, is the surest way to avoid similar pitfalls.
If your business would benefit from expert guidance, our team is here to help. We work with MSBs to review compliance programs, strengthen reporting frameworks, and deliver training that meets FINTRAC expectations.
Reach out to us to discuss how we can support your compliance goals and reduce the risk of costly penalties.
